1011121314151613 of 70
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Antimicrobial use at the end of life: a retrospective cohort study
Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7227-5113
2026 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 16, no 1, article id 12371Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Antibiotic resistance poses a global threat. Antibiotics are administered to 80-90% of terminally ill patients but evidence of their effectiveness in improving survival or symptom relief at the end of life (EOL) is scarce. To determine the proportion of deceased patients that continue antibiotic treatment after documented EOL discussion and the decision to prioritise symptom relief over active treatment. As secondary aims to compare the groups with and without antibiotics after EOL discussion in terms of differences in demographics, type of infection, mean survival time after EOL discussion and if fluid therapy followed the same trend as antibiotic use. This was a retrospective cohort study including 100 patients aged 18 years or older who died with continued or discontinued antibiotics after EOL discussion, at Blekinge Hospital from January 2022 to February 2024. Patients were excluded if they received curative intended treatment until death, did not receive antibiotics during hospitalisation, or the antibiotic treatment was ended before EOL discussion. Medical record data were compared, using chi-2- , Fisher's exact- and t-tests, between patients who continued antibiotics or not after EOL discussion, in terms of demographics, focus of infection and survival time after EOL discussion. Ethical approval was granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority on 2023-12-14 (Dnr: 2023-07647-01). A total 36% (36/100) patients continued antibiotic treatment after EOL discussion. The most prescribed antibiotics were piperacillin-tazobactam (37%) and cefotaxime (32%) and the most common site of infection was pneumonia (45%). There was no statistical significance in survival time after EOL discussion between patients with antibiotics after EOL discussion or not (mean 2.7 days (range 0-11); IQR 1-3 vs 1.9 days (range 0-10); IQR 0.75-3; 95% CI 0.46-1.05; p = 0.082). Patients who continued antibiotics were also significantly more likely to continue with intravenous fluids (11/36 (31%) vs 3/64 (5%); between-group difference of 26%; 95% CI 0.10-0.42; p = 0.001). After EOL discussion more than one-third of inpatients continued antibiotics despite a shift to symptom relief, reflecting ongoing challenges in antimicrobial stewardship in palliative care.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2026. Vol. 16, no 1, article id 12371
Keywords [en]
Receiving hospice, Antibiotic use, Care, Infections, Survival
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-29459DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-48112-2ISI: 001741842800006PubMedID: 41986436Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105035821047OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-29459DiVA, id: diva2:2056287
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2019-02081Available from: 2026-04-28 Created: 2026-04-28 Last updated: 2026-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1076 kB)7 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1076 kBChecksum SHA-512
40fa92a39f81e9ba7d3883f53e9398a7e0c9412f5a3725877f16719840b0fb507980061a3eef9d8ac9a8713f47281ebf00fcbe184249c13876dd07ed512c7593
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ekström, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekström, Magnus
By organisation
Department of Health
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 83 hits
1011121314151613 of 70
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf