Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
IMPLICATIONS OF EU INSTRUMENTS ON COMPANY CAPABILITIES TO DESIGN MORE SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS-PRODUCT ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT AND DIGITAL PRODUCT PASSPORT
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Strategic Sustainable Development.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5508-5388
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Strategic Sustainable Development.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7382-1825
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Strategic Sustainable Development.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2563-8273
2023 (English)In: Proceedings of the Design Society / [ed] Otto K., Cambridges Institutes Press, 2023, Vol. 3, p. 2245-2254Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In the EU, initiatives with concrete instruments for measuring and storing sustainability-related product data are now introduced in legislation. Based on literature review and semi-structured interviews, this study investigates two EU instruments, the Product Environmental Footprint method and Digital Product Passports, and their potential implications for company capabilities to design and select more sustainable solutions in a strategic way. The results show that these instruments can lead to increased transparency and traceability in the design and comparison of solutions, allowing for more effective collaboration across the value chain. By applying a strategic sustainability perspective, it was found that these EU instruments have major limitations as they lack a systems perspective, do not include a full socio-ecological sustainability perspective, and do not support strategic decision-making. This results in risks for suboptimization and the design of solutions that turn out to be costly dead-ends on the way towards a sustainable society. Research is therefore recommended to investigate how these instruments can facilitate a strategic development of sustainable solutions. © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridges Institutes Press, 2023. Vol. 3, p. 2245-2254
Series
Proceedings of the Design Society, E-ISSN 2732-527X ; 3
Keywords [en]
Circular economy, Digital Product Passport, Ecodesign, Sustainability, Sustainable Product Development, Decision making, Product design, Sustainable development, Digital products, Environmental footprints, Literature reviews, Product data, Related products, Semi structured interviews, Sustainable solution
National Category
Design Environmental Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-25251DOI: 10.1017/pds.2023.225Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85165501398OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-25251DiVA, id: diva2:1786443
Conference
24th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2023, Bordeaux, 24 July through 28 July 2023
Funder
VinnovaAvailable from: 2023-08-09 Created: 2023-08-09 Last updated: 2026-03-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Assessment Practices to Support Sustainable Product Development: Analyzing Approaches in Literature and Practice Through a Strategic Sustainable Development Lens
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Assessment Practices to Support Sustainable Product Development: Analyzing Approaches in Literature and Practice Through a Strategic Sustainable Development Lens
2026 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis was to understand and explore how a strategic sustainable development perspective can be integrated in product sustainability performance assessment practices. Based on an interactive qualitative research approach, three studies were conducted. The first study reviewed early-phase assessment approaches available in literature and found that although many approaches exist, a systemic and strategic perspective was often not completely addressed. Six criteria were therefore developed to support integration of such a perspective in assessment approaches. The second study focused on two EU policy instruments and while both instruments presented opportunities to incentivize and support product sustainability performance assessments, they provide limited support for considering the full socio-ecological systems perspective and long-term strategic decision-making. The third study used a multi-case study to deepen the understanding of how product developing companies work with and use product sustainability performance assessments. The findings showed that product sustainability performance was assessed, but companies face challenges and their practices were not fully aligned with a strategic sustainable development perspective. Ten propositions were formulated for what must be considered to integrate such a perspective in company practices, so that assessments can function as strategic decision-support for developing products that can contribute to society’s transition towards sustainability in ways that benefit the own organization. Together, the three studies highlight the need to develop both individual assessment approaches and the surrounding practices in which they are embedded to support effective integration of a strategic sustainable development perspective into assessment practices in the product development process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlskrona: Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, 2026
Series
Blekinge Institute of Technology Licentiate Dissertation Series, ISSN 1650-2140 ; 2026:01
Keywords
Sustainable Product Development, Sustainable Design, Sustainability, Ecodesign, Assessment, Industry Practices, Product Innovation Process, Multiple Case Study
National Category
Mechanical Engineering Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Strategic Sustainable Development
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:bth-29187 (URN)978-91-7295-522-6 (ISBN)
Presentation
2026-04-10, J1630, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Karlskrona, 09:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-03-16 Created: 2026-03-16 Last updated: 2026-03-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(556 kB)390 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 556 kBChecksum SHA-512
e56336a0ca6d73ed9f6e7f21064ac513b3b8c5d3676bcdad2f41d47774baba4ec55bb44db8175bb6a59eb2022c150cace380dfdb7db465c296836a94f7163eac
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lövdahl, JosefinHallstedt, SophieSchulte, Jesko

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lövdahl, JosefinHallstedt, SophieSchulte, Jesko
By organisation
Department of Strategic Sustainable Development
DesignEnvironmental Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 396 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 969 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf