Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Understanding and evaluating software reuse costs and benefits from industrial cases—A systematic literature review
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1181-9049
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8132-0107
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Computing, Department of Software Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6215-1774
2024 (English)In: Information and Software Technology, ISSN 0950-5849, E-ISSN 1873-6025, Vol. 171, article id 107451Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context: Software reuse costs and benefits have been investigated in several primary studies, which have been aggregated in multiple secondary studies as well. However, existing secondary studies on software reuse have not critically appraised the evidence in primary studies. Moreover, there has been relatively less focus on how software reuse costs and benefits were measured in the primary studies, and the aggregated evidence focuses more on software reuse benefits than reuse costs. Objective: This study aims to cover the gaps mentioned in the context above by synthesizing and critically appraising the evidence reported on software reuse costs and benefits from industrial cases. Method: We used a systematic literature review (SLR) to conduct this study. The results of this SLR are based on a final set of 30 primary studies. Results: We identified nine software reuse benefits and six software reuse costs, in which better quality and improved productivity were investigated the most. The primary studies mostly used defect-based and development time-based metrics to measure reuse benefits and costs. Regarding the reuse practices, the results show that software product lines, verbatim reuse, and systematic reuse were the top investigated ones, contributing to more reuse benefits. The quality assessment of the primary studies showed that most of them are either of low (20%) or moderate (67%) quality. Conclusion: Based on the number and quality of the studies, we conclude that the strength of evidence for better quality and improved productivity as reuse benefits is high. There is a need to conduct more high quality studies to investigate, not only other reuse costs and benefits, but also how relatively new reuse-related practices, such as InnerSource and microservices architecture, impact software reuse. © 2024 The Author(s)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 171, article id 107451
Keywords [en]
Software reuse, Software reuse benefits, Software reuse costs, Systematic literature review, Costs, Cost and benefits, Development time, Evaluating software, Reuse, Software reuse benefit, Software reuse cost, Software-reuse, Computer software reusability
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-26076DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107451ISI: 001223219600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189036914OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-26076DiVA, id: diva2:1849043
Part of project
OSIR- Open Source Inspired Reuse, Knowledge Foundation
Funder
Knowledge Foundation, 20190081Available from: 2024-04-05 Created: 2024-04-05 Last updated: 2026-01-14Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Improving and characterizing participatory reuse
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Improving and characterizing participatory reuse
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Context: Producers of reusable software assets frequently encounter a high volume of feature requests and bug reports from consumers. InnerSource (IS) offers a potential solution through Participatory Reuse (PR), where consumers participate in the development and maintenance of reusable assets.

Objective: This thesis aims to understand, organize, and improve PR by: 1) understanding the state of the art and practice regarding the costs, benefits, and challenges of software reuse; 2) organizing existing knowledge on PR; and 3) supporting companies in understanding and improving their PR practices.

Methods: This thesis used a mixed-methods approach (an SLR, a case survey, and four case studies) to investigate PR. The SLR explored the reported costs and benefits of software reuse. An exploratory case study assessed reuse practices at a medium-sized company, followed by an improving case study on its readiness for PR. The case survey synthesized existing knowledge into a PR catalog and taxonomy, which was validated and refined through expert evaluations and two additional case studies.

Results: The results of SLR and exploratory case study showed that improved product quality and productivity are the primary benefits of software reuse, though not without associated costs and challenges. The results of two case studies with the same company demonstrated that IS, particularly PR, can help address reuse challenges such as discoverability and ownership of reusable assets. We developed and tested an instrument to assess the company's readiness to adopt PR, identifying areas for improvement and potential solutions. To organize the PR body of knowledge, we developed a PR catalog and taxonomy. The catalog consolidated PR challenges, solutions, and lessons from industrial cases, while the taxonomy provides a mechanism to characterize PR. Finally, we developed a checklist based on the taxonomy for practitioners to assess their current PR practices and identify desired changes.

Conclusion: This thesis advances the field of PR by proposing and validating interventions to improve and characterize PR. The proposed readiness instrument helped the case company to reflect on its current PR practices and identify the areas for improvement. The PR catalog was found to be valuable by experts for providing a clear mapping from PR challenges to the associated solutions and lessons. With the help of two case studies, this thesis demonstrates the utility of the PR taxonomy and its associated checklist in characterizing PR and identifying areas for improvement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlskrona: Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, 2026. p. 245
Series
Blekinge Institute of Technology Doctoral Dissertation Series, ISSN 1653-2090 ; 2026:03
Keywords
Participatory reuse, InnerSource, case survey
National Category
Software Engineering
Research subject
Software Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:bth-29061 (URN)978-91-7295-521-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-02-19, J1630, Valhallavägen 1, Karlskrona, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Knowledge Foundation, 20190081
Available from: 2026-01-14 Created: 2026-01-14 Last updated: 2026-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1684 kB)545 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1684 kBChecksum SHA-512
399b64c5c60e2479e18186bb9cc47cee53a37f69da6d74060b3c4228b8f3b1f58d3acd73ec3446c37af7e640453c98fbfe51c7c4d9b9b9bd84260607f51690df
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Chen, XingruUsman, MuhammadBadampudi, Deepika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chen, XingruUsman, MuhammadBadampudi, Deepika
By organisation
Department of Software Engineering
In the same journal
Information and Software Technology
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 546 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 686 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf