Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability
Sahlgrenska Academy.
Malmö University.
The Västra Götaland Region Competence Centre on Intimate Partner Violence (VKV), .
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0228-1358
2024 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 24, article id 1240Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Previous research indicates that routine inquiry or screening conducted by healthcare providers may significantly increase the identification of interpersonal violence. There is a lack of comprehensive instruments to routinely assess patients about interpersonal violence and violence against children in the household. The purpose of this study was to assess the content validity, face validity and reliability of the Questions on Violence (FOV) tool, an instrument specifically designed for routine inquiries about interpersonal violence in healthcare settings within the Swedish context.

Methods: The content validity, face validity and reliability of the FOV instrument was assessed through (1) a content validity index with six experts in the field of intimate partner violence, (2) cognitive interviews with nine patients recruited from a primary healthcare facility, and (3) an evaluation of the test-retest reliability based on responses from 37(50.0%) university students. The intraclass correlation coefficient, model 2.1, was calculated to assess the degree of correlation and agreement between the two measurements.

Results: Calculations based on the content validity index indicated that five out of seven items had excellent content validity (≥ 0.78). The average content validity index of included items was 0.88, which is slightly below the recommended threshold for excellent content validity. The results based on the cognitive interviews revealed that participants found the seven items to be relevant and easy to understand. Overall, the participants agreed that the concept of ‘close relationships’ primarily encompassed intimate partners, family members, and close friends. The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85 (0.77–0.91; CI 95%), indicating good reliability with an interval of good to excellent test-retest reliability.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the seven-item FOV instrument has good content and face validity as well as good to excellent test-retest reliability. The current study provides healthcare professionals with a short yet comprehensive instrument for identifying patients who have experienced or perpetrated different forms of interpersonal violence.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 24, article id 1240
Keywords [en]
Health care, Instrument, Interpersonal violence, Reliability, Routine inquiry, Validity, Violence
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-27007DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11708-3ISI: 001334712600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85206462485OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-27007DiVA, id: diva2:1906277
Available from: 2024-10-16 Created: 2024-10-16 Last updated: 2025-01-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1642 kB)40 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1642 kBChecksum SHA-512
4783ddfeb707fa5f026732a59bb08abcf1bfd4f39a3fa4df60dcfe6c2d067e5637be8cd0ea25ccebb11e1aec9d075795d28b5d489344067cb9ddd96cf5453dc7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Örmon, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Örmon, Karin
By organisation
Department of Health
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 40 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 284 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf