Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clarifying the Concept of Meta-Models for Collaborative Decision-Making in Engineering Complex Systems
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0009-0006-4025-9799
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5114-4811
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7804-7306
2026 (English)In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2026, Vol. 770 IFIPAICT, p. 465-481Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The interchangeable usage of the term "meta-model" has caused confusion and ambiguity in research community, blurring their distinctions and applications in the context of collaborative decision-making, with a special focus on complex engineering systems. The definitions of the term found within the targeted application area are mapped and compared. The findings reveal two major interpretations of the term meta-model. One is a framework or blueprint for ensuring consistency and standardization among models, and the other is for approximating complex simulation models, providing computational efficiency. Meta-models, in both of their interpretations, serve different purposes, functions, and the scope of application. The two interpretations have a non-exclusive nature, meaning that both interpretations can be complementary rather than mutually exclusive. The goal of the study is semantic clarification to enhance comprehension and facilitate appropriate utilization of the definition within the realm of collaborative decision-making in complex engineering systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2026. Vol. 770 IFIPAICT, p. 465-481
Series
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, ISSN 1868-4238, E-ISSN 1868-422X
Keywords [en]
meta-model, collaborative-decision-making, systems-engineering
National Category
Information Systems
Research subject
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-28434DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-05673-3_28Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105041181356ISBN: 9783032056726 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-28434DiVA, id: diva2:1986772
Conference
26th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE 2025, Porto, Oct 27-29, 2025
Available from: 2025-08-04 Created: 2025-08-04 Last updated: 2026-06-23Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Model-Driven Design Decision Support Systems for Complex Engineering Systems: Challenges in Early-Design Stages
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Model-Driven Design Decision Support Systems for Complex Engineering Systems: Challenges in Early-Design Stages
2025 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Early-stage design decisions in complex engineering systems play a critical role in defining the system’s lifecycle performance, cost, and viability. As engineering systems are becoming increasingly interconnected, cyber-physical and multi-disciplinary, traditional decision-making approaches based on historical data and expert judgments often fall short. To navigate the early-stage design decision challenges and support better decision-making, model-driven decision support systems have emerged as promising tools that allow for integration of simulations, optimization, and data-driven models. Yet, in the context of complex engineering systems, the effective implementation of decision support systems remains limited due to socio-technical challenges. 

This thesis systematically investigates and identifies challenges through a literature review and empirical case studies in an industrial setting. The research identified interrelated barriers that hinder effective decision support systems integration and utilization. First, difficulty in integrating heterogeneous simulation models across varying levels of granularity remains technically and methodologically challenging. Second, the uneven maturity level of decision support systems across engineering domains limits their consistent use in collaborative environments. Third, a lack of accessible and intuitive interfaces negatively impacts the usability for non-expert stakeholders. Fourth, the absence of a real-time feedback mechanism limits their function as a boundary object. Fifth, the lack of metrics to gauge and communicate model maturity and reliability creates risks for misinformed decisions. Lastly, the lack of lifecycle management, including evolution, traceability, and reliability of the underlying models, is rarely supported, which undermines long-term sustainability and trust in the decision support systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlskrona: Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, 2025. p. 122
Series
Blekinge Institute of Technology Licentiate Dissertation Series, ISSN 1650-2140 ; 2025:07
Keywords
Decision-support-systems, model-driven, decision-making, systems engineering
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:bth-28436 (URN)978-91-7295-505-9 (ISBN)
Presentation
2025-09-17, G340, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-08-11 Created: 2025-08-04 Last updated: 2025-09-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Rehman, Mubeen UrBertoni, AlessandroWall, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rehman, Mubeen UrBertoni, AlessandroWall, Johan
By organisation
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Information Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 156 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf